These Algorithms Look at X-Rays—and Somehow Detect Your Race

 

MILLIONS OF DOLLARS are being spent to develop artificial intelligence software that reads x-rays and other medical scans in hopes it can spot things doctors look for but sometimes miss, such as lung cancers. A new study reports that these algorithms can also see something doctors don't look for on such scans: a patient's race. READ MORE. digitalfitnessworld

The study authors and other medical AI experts say the results make it more crucial than ever to check that health algorithms perform pretty on people with different racial identities. Complicating that task: The authors themselves aren't sure what cues the algorithms they created to use to predict a person's race.

Evidence that algorithms can read race from a person's medical scans emerged from tests on five types of imaging used in radiology research, including chest and hand x-rays and mammograms. The images included patients who identified as Black, white, and Asian. For each type of scan, the researchers trained algorithms using images labelled with a patient's self-reported race. Then they challenged the algorithms to predict patients' race in different, unlabeled photos.

Radiologists don't generally consider a person's racial identity—which is not a biological category—to be visible on scans that look beneath the skin. Yet the algorithms somehow proved capable of accurately detecting it for all three racial groups and across different views of the body.

For most types of scans, the algorithms could correctly identify which of two images was from a Black person more than 90 per cent of the time. Even the worst-performing algorithm succeeded 80 per cent of the time; the best was 99 per cent correct. The results and associated code were posted online late last month by a group of more than 20 researchers with expertise in medicine and machine learning, but the study has not yet been peer-reviewed.

The results have spurred new concerns that AI software can amplify inequality in health care, where studies show Black patients and other marginalized racial groups often receive inferior care compared to wealthy or white people.

Machine-learning algorithms are tuned to read medical images by feeding them many labelled examples of conditions such as tumours. By digesting many instances, the algorithms can learn patterns of pixels statistically associated with those labels, such as the texture or shape of a lung nodule. Some algorithms made that way rival doctors at detecting cancers or skin problems; there is evidence they can see signs of disease invisible to human experts.

Judy Gichoya, a radiologist and assistant professor at Emory University who worked on the new study, says the revelation that image algorithms can "see" race in internal scans likely primes them also to learn inappropriate associations.

"We have to educate people about this problem and research what we can do to mitigate it."

JUDY GICHOYA, RADIOLOGIST AND ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, EMORY UNIVERSITY

Medical data used to train algorithms often bears traces of racial inequalities in disease and medical treatment due to historical and socioeconomic factors. That could lead an algorithm searching for statistical patterns in scans to use its guess at a patient's race as a kind of shortcut, suggesting diagnoses that correlate with racially biased patterns from its training data, not just the visible medical anomalies that radiologists look for. An algorithm might offer different diagnoses for a Black person and white person with similar signs of disease. Such a system might give some patients an incorrect diagnosis or a false all-clear.

"We have to educate people about this problem and research what we can do to mitigate it," Gichoya says. Her collaborators on the project came from institutions including Purdue, MIT, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan, University of Toronto, and Stanford. Previous studies have shown that medical algorithms have caused biases in care delivery and that image algorithms may perform unequally for different demographic groups. In 2019, a widely used algorithm for prioritizing care for the sickest patients was found to disadvantage Black people. In 2020, researchers at the University of Toronto and MIT showed that algorithms trained to flag conditions such as pneumonia on chest x-rays sometimes performed differently for people of different sexes, ages, races, and types of medical insurance.

Paul Yi, director of the University of Maryland's Intelligent Imaging Center, who was not involved in the new study showing algorithms can detect race, describes some of its findings as "eye-opening," even "crazy."

Radiologists like him don't typically think about race when interpreting scans or even know how a patient self-identifies. "Race is a social construct and not in itself a biological phenotype, even though it can be associated with differences in anatomy," Yi says.

Frustratingly, the authors of the new study could not figure out how exactly their. READ MORE. gravtechnology